Preview

Biosafety and Biotechnology

Advanced search

Assessment of the Susceptibility of Laboratory Animals to Cowpox Virus for the Selection of an Experimental Model

https://doi.org/10.58318/2957-5702-2026-25-32-41

Abstract

Cowpox virus, belonging to the genus Orthopoxvirus, is widely used as a model for studying orthopoxvirus infections. Despite the availability of data on the susceptibility of different animal species, its assessment under standardized experimental conditions remains limited.

The aim of this study was to assess the susceptibility of laboratory animals to cowpox virus and to substantiate the selection of an optimal experimental model.

The epizootic strain “COWPOX-CAM” of cowpox virus was used in this study. White mice, guinea pigs, and rabbits were employed as experimental models and infected via the intradermal route. Clinical observations were performed, and the course of the infectious process and the development of pathological changes were evaluated.

In guinea pigs, the infection was mild and not associated with mortality. In white mice, the clinical manifestations of infection were mild and were not accompanied by the development of characteristic skin lesions. In rabbits, a pronounced clinical course was observed, including both local and systemic manifestations of infection.

The results obtained indicate that rabbits demonstrate the highest susceptibility to cowpox virus and can be considered the most appropriate experimental model for studying the pathogenesis of infection and evaluating the efficacy of vaccines and therapeutic agents.

About the Authors

A. B. Aliyeva
LLP «Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems», National holding «QazBioPharm»
Kazakhstan

Guardeyskiy.



K. B. Barakbayev
LLP «Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems», National holding «QazBioPharm»
Kazakhstan

Guardeyskiy.



M. A. Azanbekova
LLP «Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems», National holding «QazBioPharm»
Kazakhstan

Guardeyskiy.



D. I. Muzarap
LLP «Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems», National holding «QazBioPharm»
Kazakhstan

Guardeyskiy.



N. A. Sarsenkulova
LLP «Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems», National holding «QazBioPharm»
Kazakhstan

Guardeyskiy.



M. Mambetaliev
LLP «Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems», National holding «QazBioPharm»
Kazakhstan

Guardeyskiy.



K. D. Zhugunissov
LLP «Research Institute for Biological Safety Problems», National holding «QazBioPharm»
Russian Federation

Guardeyskiy.



References

1. Bruneau R.C., et al. Cowpox viruses: a zoo full of viral diversity and lurking threat. Viruses. 2023; 15(3): 623. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030623

2. Riedel S. Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination. Proceedings (Baylor University Medical Center). 2005;18(1): 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2005.11928028

3. Gavrilova E.V. Ortopoksvirusnye infektsii: epidemiologiya, klinicheskaya kartina i diagnostika. Problemy osobo opasnykh infektsiy. 2013; №4: 82–87.

4. Shchelkunov S.N. An increasing danger of zoonotic orthopoxvirus infections. PLoS Pathogens. 2013; 9(12): e1003756. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1003756

5. Shchelkunova G.A., Shchelkunov S.N. 40 years without smallpox. Acta Naturae. 2017; 9(4): 4– 12.

6. Lvov D.K. Ospa korov. In: Rukovodstvo po virusologii: virusy i virusnye infektsii cheloveka i zhivotnykh. Ed. D.K. Lvov. Moscow: Meditsinskoe informatsionnoe agentstvo; 2013: 668–670.

7. Zapadnyuk I.P., Zapadnyuk V.I., Zakhariya E.A., Zapadnyuk B.V. Laboratornye zhivotnye: razvedenie, soderzhanie, ispol'zovanie v eksperimente. Kiev: Vysshaya shkola; 1983. 383 p.

8. Hutson C.L., Abel J.A., Carroll D.S., et al. Comparison of West African and Congo Basin monkeypox viruses in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. PLoS ONE. 2009;5(1): e8912. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008912

9. Marriott K.A., Parkinson C.V., Morefield S.I., et al. Clonal vaccinia virus grown in cell culture fully protects monkeys from lethal monkeypox challenge. Vaccine. 2007; 26(5): 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.11.038

10. Osorio J.E., Iams K.P., Meteyer C.U., Rocke T.E. Comparison of monkeypox virus pathogenesis in mice by in vivo imaging. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(8): e6592. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006592

11. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2011. 246 p.

12. Hutson C.L., Olson V.A., Carroll D.S., et al. A prairie dog animal model of systemic orthopoxvirus disease using West African and Congo Basin strains of monkeypox virus. Journal of General Virology. 2009;90(2): 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.005108-0

13. Zaucha G.M., Jahrling P.B., Geisbert T.W., et al. The pathology of experimental aerosolized monkeypox virus infection in cynomolgus monkeys. Laboratory Investigation. 2001;81(12): 1581–1600. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3780362

14. Reed K.D., Melski J.W., Graham M.B., et al. The detection of monkeypox in humans in the Western Hemisphere. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;350(4): 342–350. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032299.

15. Reith R.W., Williamson J.D. Pathogenesis of vaccinia and cowpox infections. Poxvirus and Iridovirus Meeting. 1996: 364.

16. Mims C.A. The response of mice to the intravenous injection of cowpox virus. British Journal of Experimental Pathology. 1968;49(4): 361–363.

17. Chen N., Li G., Liszewski M.K., et al. Virulence differences between monkeypox virus isolates from West Africa and the Congo Basin. Journal of Virology. 2005;79(20): 13100–13107. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.79.20.13100-13107.2005

18. Americo J.L., Moss B., Earl P.L. Identification of wild-derived inbred mouse strains highly susceptible to monkeypox virus infection. Journal of Virology. 2010;84(16): 8172–8180. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00521-10

19. Marennikova S.S., Shchelkunov S.N. Patogennye dlya cheloveka ortopoksvirusy. Moscow: KMK; 1998. 386 p.

20. Hammarlund E., Lewis M.W., Carter S.V., et al. Multiple diagnostic techniques identify protective immunity against monkeypox. Nature Medicine. 2005;11(9): 1005–1011. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1273

21. McFadden G. Poxvirus tropism. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2005;3(3): 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1099

22. Onishchenko G.G., et al. Ortopoksvirusy: sovremennoe sostoyanie problemy. Vestnik RAMN. 2020;75(4): 300–305. https://doi.org/10.15690/vramn1360

23. Fenner F., Henderson D.A., Arita I., et al. Smallpox and its eradication. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1988. 1460 p.

24. Essbauer S., Pfeffer M., Meyer H. Zoonotic poxviruses. Veterinary Microbiology. 2010;140(3–4): 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.08.026

25. Moss B. Poxviridae: the viruses and their replication. In: Knipe D.M., Howley P.M. Fields Virology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013: 2129–2159.

26. Reynolds M.G., Damon I.K. Outbreaks of human monkeypox after cessation of smallpox vaccination. Trends in Microbiology. 2012;20(2): 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2011.12.001

27. Kumar V., Abbas A.K., Aster J.C. Robbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of Disease. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020. 1392 p.

28. Murphy K., Weaver C. Janeway’s Immunobiology. 9th ed. New York: Garland Science; 2017. 904 p.

29. Gendon Yu.Z., Chernos V.I. Informosomy kletok HeLa, zarazhennykh virusom ospovaktsiny. Molekulyarnaya biologiya. 1968; №2: 727–735.

30. Mätz-Rensing K., Yue C., Ellerbrok H., et al. Limited susceptibility of rhesus macaques to cowpox virus infection. Primate Biology. 2017;4: 163–171. https://doi.org/10.5194/pb-4-163-2017

31. Johnson R.F., Dyall J., Ragland D.R., et al. Aerosol exposure of rhesus macaques to cowpox virus Brighton Red. Journal of General Virology. 2016;97(9): 2213–2222. https://doi.org/10.1099/jgv.0.000538


Review

For citations:


Aliyeva A.B., Barakbayev K.B., Azanbekova M.A., Muzarap D.I., Sarsenkulova N.A., Mambetaliev M., Zhugunissov K.D. Assessment of the Susceptibility of Laboratory Animals to Cowpox Virus for the Selection of an Experimental Model. Biosafety and Biotechnology. 2026;(25):32-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.58318/2957-5702-2026-25-32-41

Views: 115

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2707-7241 (Print)
ISSN 2957-5702 (Online)