SCREENING OF NEW SOYBEAN CULTIVARS AND CULTIVAR SAMPLES TOWARDS COMMON DISEASES IN KAZAKHSTAN
https://doi.org/10.58318/2957-5702-2023-14-52-62
Abstract
As part of the strategy to diversify cultivated areas and increase the profitability of agricultural enterprises, oilseeds, including soybeans, represent a promising direction for the development of the agricultural sector in the country. Kazakhstan is among the top 20 soybeanproducing countries globally. However, significant damage to soybean crops in the region was affected primarily by fungal diseases, leading to 20-50 % yield losses. This article presents field experiments conducted in the arid submontane agro-climatic Zhambyl region, focusing on the resistance of the global soybean collection. The study used 276 soybean varieties from Eastern Europe, Western Europe, North America, East Asia, and Kazakhstan. Screening of world soybean collection from 25 countries for field resistance towards various pathogens demonstrated a total of 197 soybean sources resistant to Cercospora sojina, 260 resistant to Septoria glycines, 76 resistant to Pseudomonas solanacearum, and 174 resistant to Peronospora manchurica. Among the tested samples, 24 soybean varieties of different origins exhibited high resistance to all pathogens, accounting for only 8.79% of those evaluated in the field during this experiment. These findings highlight the importance of identifying and utilizing disease-resistant soybean varieties to mitigate the impact of fungal diseases and improve soybean production in the region.
About the Authors
A. D. MaylenbaiKazakhstan
Head of the laboratory , Master of Technical Sciences
Guardeysky
N. D. Kurymbaeva
Kazakhstan
Junior Research, Fellow Master of Science
Guardeysky
G. Sh. Yskakova
Kazakhstan
Research Fellow, Master of Science
Guardeysky
M. Zh. Baigutov
Kazakhstan
Senior Assistant
Guardeysky
A. M. Asraubaeva
Kazakhstan
Senior Assistant
Guardeysky
A. S. Rsaliyev
Kazakhstan
Candidate of Agricultural Sciences, Professor
Guardeysky
References
1. Мауи А.А., Илюхин Г.П., Ануарова Л.Е. Болезни сои в Казахстане. Алматы. – 2018. – 172 с.
2. Дидоренко С.В. Достижения селекционных работ по сое в Казахстане // Вестник сельскохозяйственной науки Казахстана. - 2014. - N 1. - С.22-27.
3. Makulbekova A., Iskakov A., Kulkarni K.P., Song J.T., Lee J.D. Current status of future prospects of soybean production in Kazakhstan // Plant Breeding and Biotechnology - 2017. - Vol.5. - P.55-66. DOI:10.9787/PBB.2017.5.2.055.
4. Hartman G. L., West E. D., Herman T. K. Crops that feed the World 2. Soybean-worldwide production, use, and constraints caused by pathogens and pests // Food Security. – 2011. – Vol. 3. (1). – P.5-17.
5. Dean R., Van Kan J. A., Pretorius Z. A., Hammond Kosack K. E., Di Pietro A., Spanu P. D., Foster G.D. The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology // Molecular plant pathology. – 2012. - Vol. 13. (4). – P.414-430.
6. Savary S., Willocquet L., Pethybridge S. J., Esker P., McRoberts N., Nelson A. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops // Nature ecology & evolution. – 2019. – Vol. 3. – P.430-439.
7. Баранов В. Ф., Махонин В. Л. О биологической защите агрофитоценозов сои от вредных организмов // Масличные культуры. – 2014. – Вып. 1 (157-158). – С.152-164.
8. Delaney M., ArchMiller A. A., Delaney D. P., Wilson A. E., Sikora E. J. Effectiveness of fungicide on soybean rust in the southeastern United States: a meta-analysis // Sustainability. – 2018. – Vol.10. (6). – P.1784.
9. Zatybekov A., Abugalieva S., Didorenko S., Rsaliyev A., Turuspekov Y. GWAS of a soybean breeding collection from South East and South Kazakhstan for resistance to fungal diseases. // Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding. – 2018. – Vol.22(5). – P.536-543.
10. Дидоренко С.В., Сагитов А.О., Кудайбергенов М.С. Основные заболевания на посевах сои и методы борьбы с ними. //Агроалем. – 2014. – №8(61). – C.42-46.
11. Cortes L.T., Zhang Z., Yu J. Status and prospects of genome‐wide association studies in plants // Plant genome. – 2021. – Vol.14, No.1: e20077. https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20077.
12. Korte A., Farlow A. The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review // Plant Methods. – 2013. – Vol.9, No.1. – P.29. doi:10.1186/1746-4811-9-29.
13. Абугалиева С.И. Генетическое разнообразие сои (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) // Биотехнология. Теория и практика. – 2013. – №4. – С.13-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.11134/btp.4.2013.2
14. Туруспеков Е.К. Состояние и перспективы развития молекулярной генетики ячменя в Казахстане // Вестник КазНУ. Серия биологическая. – 2010. - №3(45). – С. 90-96.
15. Билай В.И. Фузарии (Биология и систематика). – Киев: Изд-во АН УССР, 1977. – 442 с.
16. Seifert K., Morgan-Jones G., Gams W., Kendrick B. The genera of Hyphomycetes. // CBS Biodiversity Series. – 2011. – Vol. 9. – P. 1-997.
17. Basu P.K., Butler G. Assessment of brown spot (Septoria glycines) alone and in combination with bacterial blight (Pseudomonas syringae pv. Glycinea) on soybeans in a short-season area // Canadian Journal of Plant pathology. – 1988. – Vol.10. – P.78-82.
18. Horsfall J.G., Barratt, R.W. An improved grading system for measuring plant diseases // Phytopathology. – 1945. – Vol. 35. – P.655.
19. Sinclair J.B. Compendium of Soybean Diseases. – Saint Paul: American Phytopathological Society Press. – 1982. – 104 p.
20. Madden L.V., Hughes G., van den Bosch F. The study of plant disease epidemics. // Phytopathology. – 2007. – Vol. 90. – P. 576–594.
21. Затыбеков А.К. Оценка генетического разнообразия сои для повышения устойчивости к наиболее опасным грибковым болезням в условиях юго-востока Казахстана: Диссертация на соискание степени доктора философии (PhD): 6D081100 // Затыбеков А.К. – Алматы, 2019. – 156 с.
Review
For citations:
Maylenbai A.D., Kurymbaeva N.D., Yskakova G.Sh., Baigutov M.Zh., Asraubaeva A.M., Rsaliyev A.S. SCREENING OF NEW SOYBEAN CULTIVARS AND CULTIVAR SAMPLES TOWARDS COMMON DISEASES IN KAZAKHSTAN. Biosafety and Biotechnology. 2023;(14):52-62. https://doi.org/10.58318/2957-5702-2023-14-52-62